Monday, February 16, 2015

The Irrepressible "Jolly Joe Benjamin"

by Kelli Huggins, Education Coordinator

One of the coolest things about historical research is that one small question or one tiny scrap of evidence can lead you down a totally unexpected rabbit hole.  For example, the genesis of this blog post came from a discussion I was having with curator Erin as we prepped for CCHS's new candy exhibit, Sweet!  The exhibit features a drawing of J. Benjamin's candy store in Elmira, which on its roof, appears to have a giant statue of "Aunt Susan," the character he used to promote his candy.  This made us want to know if there really was a huge Aunt Susan on the roof or if this was just an artistic flourish.  I love a good puzzle, so I went into detective mode.  And so, on my hunt to find out more about the mysterious Aunt Susan, I actually uncovered the even more interesting story of the man behind the marketing ploy.

The building and the giant rooftop Aunt Susan in question.
Joseph Augustus Benjamin was born on August 9, 1852 in Canadaigua, NY and came to Elmira at some point in his early life.  Benjamin made a name for himself early on as "Jolly Joe Benjamin".  As a young man in the 1870s, "Jolly Joe," a natural performer, began travelling with the DeGraff Minstrels, and later the Queen City Minstrels.  Minstrel shows featured white actors performing in blackface, a popular form of entertainment in the 1800s that we now recognize as racist.  He performed with and befriended other Elmirans, including the famous costumer Matt Lockwood.  With the DeGraff Minstrels, Benjamin peddled his "comicalities without vulgarity" in "every hamlet within a radius of fifty or sixty miles of Elmira."  The men had many adventures, including stealing chestnuts in Mecklenburg, NY and performing for coal miners in Arnot, PA (which went poorly when the miners stole their seats off the stage and "drank up the water that we were keeping to wash up in after the performance").  In Mainesburg, PA, Benjamin joked with a farm wife who was feeding them that her pies were very affectionate.  The confused farm wife didn't understand, so Benjamin delivered the punch line: because "the upper crust hugs the lower one so tightly."  Apparently that joke was wildly popular with minstrel audiences.  The farm wife was not impressed.
Jolly Joe Benjamin, c. 1894
The minstrel troops weren't Benjamin's only performing experience.   He was a member of Asa LaFrance's band which performed all across the region.  Benjamin began as a "cymbal smasher," but eventually was promoted to drum major.  As drum major, Benjamin wore "brass from the soles of his feet to the top of his bear skin hat."  The elaborately plumed hat is now a part of CCHS' collection.

Benjamin's epic LaFrance Band drum major hat.  Those feathers!
During a stormy parade in Rochester, conditions were so poor that he had to leave his hat back at the hotel.  He "had hard enough work swinging his wet baton, tossing it up in the rain, in an official manner, and retaining the damp document as it descended through the saturated skies into his equally well saturated gloves.  He was some drum major, let me tell you."

At this time, Benjamin maintained a day job as a tinsmith.  However, he still found a way to incorporate his passion for performance into his trade.  According to a report, "the clown, Benjamin, was a musician by birth and a tinsmith by trade.  He had constructed a long tin musical machine that looked and sounded like a clarionet [sic].  By pushing a valve, and turning the thing the other way, it sounded exactly like a flute."

Benjamin's work as a tinsmith didn't last for long, and by 1878, he operated a fruit business.  His fruit trade soon evolved into a candy business.  He first sold candy from a wagon, where he also sold sandwiches, creating one of the first lunch wagons in the city.  In the 1880s, he opened a candy store on the corner of Water and Exchange Streets.  The elaborate building was said to contain all modern conveniences. 
A small selection of his many candy offerings.
Benjamin's was known for it's Aunt Susan's Butternut Taffy.  The advertising featured a drawing of the supposed namesake maker, but as a newspaper succinctly put it, "Joe was Aunt Susan." 
Caricature of Aunt Susan drawn by artist Eugene "Zim" Zimmerman.  Courtesy of the Horseheads Historical Society.
 

Benjamin was a natural salesman.  When the US government introduced, and then quickly reversed course and eliminated, their redesigned nickel with the letter "V" on the back in 1883, Benjamin saw an opportunity.  He acquired a couple thousand and sold them at ten cents each as souvenirs.  Benjamin was also a prolific advertiser.  CCHS has many of his trade cards.



In this period, "Jolly Joe" was a fixture in the news in a series of other eccentric endeavors.  In during the 1889 flood, he rowed a boat around the flooded Rathbun Hotel.  In 1894, he was trying to return a Confederate Civil War relic and soldier photograph that he discovered to a rightful family member.  In 1897, he and another man found an eel pond in Binghamton that was projected to be able to provide over a ton of eels to local hotel restaurants. 

Eventually, Benjamin left the confections business to sell cash registers.  He successfully maintained the business in Elmira for years (despite incidents that caused him to declare that he would "never sell another cash register to an undertaker," which sounds like it has a great story behind it!).  However, in 1894, Benjamin left Elmira for a position with the National Cash Register Company in Rochester.  In Rochester, Benjamin quickly rose up the company ranks.  He was considered "king of sales agents and the king bee of cash register men."  By 1914, he was the manager of the company.  When he retired, one of his sons (one of his six children with wife Julie) took over his position.  According to one record, Benjamin lived to be 95, dying in 1948.

So, if you're still reading (or skimming) this lengthy post at this point, you'll notice that I haven't answered the question that started this whole project: was there or wasn't there a giant Aunt Susan on the top of the building?!?  Well, unfortunately despite all of the considerable effort I have put into this, I can't answer that question.  I have found no mentions of it in the newspapers and we have no photographs of that building from the era the store was operating.  Frustrating, I know.  For what it's worth, my best historical guess is yes, there actually was a giant Aunt Susan (but perhaps that is just wishful thinking on my part).  I think that the evidence and narrative that I have presented to you depicts Benjamin as a knowingly eccentric and creative man.  To me, he is definitely the kind of guy who would put a large figure atop his building.  In my mind, giant Aunt Susan was a reality, and she was awesome. 
That mysterious minx, Aunt Susan
 

 

Saturday, January 31, 2015

History Carnival #142

We are excited to host History Carnival #142.  Reading all of these diverse and interesting blogs has given us new perspectives on our own blogging work.

The first blogs this month all had a distinctly icky, yet surprisingly timely, quality. "Bestiality in a Time of Small Pox" by Rob Boddice at Notches chronicles early anti-vaccination movements and how they reflect our current debates. Similarly, "Measles in History" by Lisa Smith at The Sloane Letters discusses current measles outbreaks in the context of the disease's deadly history.  “Eat! Eat! Eat! Those Notorious Tapeworm Diet Pills” by Caroline Rance at The Quack Doctor investigates the myth of the tapeworm diet, showing how contemporary weight-loss obsessions are nothing new.   Reading "Six Cold and Flu Medicines You're Not Taking Today (And For Good Reason)" by Maria Anderson at Smithsonian Science during cold and flu season has made us thankful for medical regulation. 

The next group of blogs told stories about the complex intersection of sexuality and morality.  "The King's Favourite: Sex, Money and Power in Medieval England" by Katherine Harvey at Notches describes in graphic detail the consequences of excessive "favoritism" in royal politics.  To a similar end, "Mary Carleton, the Heroine Bigamist" at jliedl.ca talks about how a female commoner became notorious for her sexual and criminal exploits.

War and conflict was a topic that came up in several blogs.  "France's Wars: The Vikings 793-1066" by Jack Le Moine at History Moments gave a sweeping account of the golden age of the Vikings.  "Quakers and the Kindertransport" at The Iron Room discusses the efforts to save Jewish children in the early days of World War II.  "We Must Forgive But We Won't Forget- The Treaty Debates in the Border Counties" by John Dorney at the Irish Story presents many perspectives on the conflict around the Irish Treaty of 1921.  Finally, in "A Most Dangerous Rivalry" at The Sloane Letters, James Hawkes presents a fascinating story of doctors behaving badly in the 18th century in his dramatic telling of the personal conflict between Drs. Sloane and Woodward. 
 
Two blogs talked about experiencing place and historical landscapes.  In "What We Leave Behind" at Tracking William West Durant, author Sheila Myers' personal journey takes her to Greenwood Cemetery in Brooklyn, New York where she reflects on the history of the rural cemetery movement.  Also in New York, "Dam That Creek!- Erie Canal Dams of the Schoharie Creek" by David Brooks at Friends of Schoharie Crossing uses the remains of a local dam to tell an important story in regional history.
 
The final blogs deal with history as a profession.  "How Historians Read Film (Part 1)" by Jason M. Kelly encourages students and viewers to think critically about film through a historical lens.  In "Turning on the Microphone," Adolfo Mendez of Two Histories talks about the role of historians in society.   "The Power of Story" by Brandy Schillace at Fiction Reboot/Daily Dose meditates on the importance of story and what it tell us about our own humanity.  As museum professionals, we enjoyed Jai Virdi-Desi's photo essay "Fashion Victims" at From the Hands of Quacks, a review of a beautiful new exhibit at the Bata Shoe Museum.
 
Thanks to everyone for submitting these great blog posts.  We learned a lot!  The next History Carnival will be at Unspoken Assumptions on March 1, 2015. 

 

 

Monday, January 26, 2015

What Really Went on in Those Church Meetings??

by volunteer Kristen Goble

This summer, archivist Rachel Dworkin, assigned me the task of sorting and cataloging the United Baptist Church Collection.  While sorting the collection I came across the First Baptist Church Meeting Minutes for the years 1829-1859.  Although the book looked ancient,  once I got past my fear of touching it and having to explain to the staff how exactly the book turned into a pile of dust on the research table, I became completely engrossed.  The detailed accounts of every meeting, written out in beautiful penmanship, going back to the early days of settlement in the Chemung Valley were by far my favorite part of the collection. 

Page from the First Baptist Church Ledger

For me, the most interesting meetings dealt with problem members of First Baptist Church.  Members of the newly formed church were expected to abide by a strict moral code of conduct.  As in any community though, there were a few rebellious types who neglected to uphold the church imposed standards of the day.  In the records, I came across members who were accused of heresy, using foul language, and a certain female supposedly dressed in men’s clothing and attended a gentlemen’s lecture (shocking!).

These rebellious members were all paid a visit by a committee of elders and, if the offense was bad enough, faced exclusion from the church.  It seems the offender, or her husband, was usually given a chance to publically apologize to the church and ask forgiveness for their behavior.  If the church elders felt an honest apology was made, the member would be allowed to resume their relationship with the church.  I did come across an occasion when a female church member was denied reacceptance because her apology was deemed insincere.  Regardless of the outcome, the church always prayed for the offender’s soul.

The early First Baptist Church was also quite charitable.  If any church family was in need, the elders would discuss it at the church meeting.  From there, a delegate from the church would pay a visit to the head of the family to determine why they were experiencing hardship.  Were they just down on their luck, or was there a misappropriation of money?  From there, the delegate would report back to the church at the next meeting.  If the family was deemed to have a legitimate need, the church would provide them with financial assistance.  If the need was due to gambling… well, see the previous paragraph… Once the family had regained financial security, repayment of the money was expected.

This book was just one of many treasures I found in the United Baptist Church Collection.  After scouring it, I became completely enamored with the project and learned more than I ever imagined about First Baptist Church and Southside Baptist Church.  I am very grateful to Rachel for her help and the opportunity to work with this incredible collection.


Original First Baptist Church